MyLuckySeat

Where you sit and crash outcomes

No seat is reliably safest. Two small US studies found that passengers in the rear of the cabin died less often in crashes that had both survivors and fatalities, and evacuation research found that sitting within about five rows of an exit matters most. Both findings come with large caveats, listed below.

What the studies found

Share of passengers who died, by section, in crashes that had both survivors and fatalities:

StudySampleFrontMiddleRear
Popular Mechanics (2007)20 US crashes, 1971–200751%44%31%
TIME (2015)17 US crashes, 1985–200038%39%32%

Popular Mechanics (2007). NTSB investigation reports and seating charts. Sections: Front = first/business class (or the front 15% of all-economy cabins); over-wing; rear = behind the wing's trailing edge. Rear passengers did better in 11 crashes, front passengers in 5; 3 showed no pattern and 1 could not be determined. Published as a survival rate (49% / 56% / 69%).

TIME (2015). FAA CSRTG Aircraft Accident Database seating charts. Sections: Cabin split into thirds. Middle seats in the rear third had the lowest figure (28%); aisle seats in the middle third the highest (44%). The article quotes the FAA: there is no safest seat.

Exits

University of Greenwich (Prof. Ed Galea). 105 survivable accidents, 1977–1999, about 1,900 passengers. Passengers seated within about five rows of a usable exit were most likely to get out. Aisle seats did better than window seats. Galea: "There is no magic safest seat… it depends on the nature of the accident."

How the section colours are derived

Limits

Sources

Tell us what you think

Was this page useful?